logo

44 pages 1 hour read

Letters to My Palestinian Neighbor

Nonfiction | Collection of Letters | Adult | Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Letters 7-10Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Letter 7 Summary: “Isaac and Ishmael”

The occasion for Letter 7 is the beginning of Eid al-Adha, the Muslim festival marking their traditions regarding the patriarch Abraham and his son, Ishmael. Both Judaism and Islam see Abraham as a foundational figure but trace their descent from different sons, Ishmael and Isaac. In some cases, they share overlapping stories about the two sons, such as the belief that Abraham nearly sacrificed Ishmael/Isaac at one point. In this letter, Halevi once again narrates a visit to Hebron, which is the Jewish city most closely associated with Abraham and his family. He takes note of the Muslim and Jewish worship practices at the dual site in Hebron, suggesting that each side has a great depth of devotional richness that they could share with each other if they were inclined toward peaceful dialogue. Unfortunately, the location has been the site of terrorism—in this case, from the Jewish side, attacking Muslim worshipers—and so the current prospects for a harmony of faiths at Hebron seem distant.

Halevi uses this reflection to draw attention to another site with even more religious import for both sides: the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa in Jerusalem. A site of the greatest holiness for both Jews and Muslims, it is the location of the ancient Jewish temple and of a sacred tradition from the Prophet Muhammad’s life. Halevi points to the pragmatism with which Jews have tended to regard the administration of the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa, agreeing to limit their own devotional access to the site despite the territorial sovereignty that they exercise over the area. He also tries to assuage some of the fears Palestinians have regarding future Jewish attempts to claim the area or to restrict Muslim access, regarding such things as little more than false rumors and baseless conspiracy theories.

Rather than having these holy sites become flashpoints of conflict, Halevi hopes that they can be centers of mutual recognition. Both traditions, he points out, have avenues within their teachings that can be used to uphold the dignity of the other tradition or, by contrast, to malign it. “The archetypes [of each other] in both traditions are hardly flattering—yet they also contain a basis for respecting the other’s spiritual dignity. We need to seek out those generous voices embedded in our traditions […]” (147). Ultimately, Halevi writes, the Holy Land of Israel/Palestine does not belong to either of them, but to God—the same God of Abraham whom both sides worship, so it is on the basis of that shared foundation of faith that harmony can be established.

Letter 8 Summary: “The Israeli Paradox”

With Letter 8, Halevi attempts to describe some of the features of Israeli life and culture for the benefit of his Palestinian neighbor. Halevi worries that Israeli and Palestinian societies are growing so estranged from each other that opportunities for true understanding are drying up, so he takes the initiative in trying to offer a helpful guide to the complexities of Israeli life. He describes Israel as being paradoxical. It is both a democratic state and a Jewish nation, a balance which is maintained even with a significant Arab-Israeli minority. “I define Israel as a secular state in a holy land” (156)—a modern nation wrestling with a conviction of its ancient calling. In addition to the secular/religious paradox, Israel is also a wildly diverse mix even within its Jewish population. In Israel, Jews from eastern traditions and western traditions with wide cultural disparities come together to try to form a single family: “The core community that founded Israel was overwhelmingly Ashkenazi and secular, and secularism remains vibrant; at the same time our music, cuisine, even language are all increasingly influenced by traditional Mizrahi culture” (157). In this mix of cultures from all over the world, Jewish identity remains a binding force, though Halevi admits that its character is often less one of family harmony and more one of sibling arguments. Even that very Jewish identity exists in paradox, because the Arab-Israeli body of citizens constitutes a full fifth of the country, and many of them identify as Palestinian.

In regard to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, Halevi identifies yet another paradox in Israel: a clear sense of moral conviction met with the necessities of a strict security regime. From their own history of suffering persecution, repression, and genocide, most Israelis bear a high sense of moral conscience regarding their treatment of others, and yet the circumstances of their day-to-day life appear in their view to require the exertion of force in ways that place them in uncomfortable and morally compromising roles. In all these paradoxes, Halevi sees Israel as an experiment being run for the benefit of the whole world, a place where the dual tensions of east and west, religion and secularism, ethnicity and democratic rule, and morals and security can meet and struggle for balance. These tensions, Halevi argues, are explored in a more practical and direct way in Israel than most other societies will ever have to face, and so Israel’s paradox may eventually turn out to be a blessing to the world.

Letter 9 Summary: “Victims and Survivors”

The occasion for Letter 9 is the observance of Holocaust Memorial Day. Halevi writes that he has avoided bringing up the Holocaust until this point in the book, as its weight makes it too difficult to use in establishing a dialogue. It causes extreme reactions and is too likely to be denied by one side or used as manipulation by the other. Still, Halevi does not shy away from it. He is the son of a Holocaust survivor, and he makes the point that Jews lay stress on their survivorship not as victims, but as victors. Far from claiming a victim mentality, he asserts that Israeli Jews are proud of their endurance, through the Holocaust as through many other historical traumas, and that the Jews can claim to have outlasted every empire that tried to wipe them out, from ancient Egypt to the Nazi Third Reich. While the Holocaust was part of the historical narrative associated with the rise of Israel as a modern nation-state, Halevi resists the implication that Israel only exists because the Holocaust happened—it would be just as true, he points out, to say that the Holocaust only happened because Israel did not exist.

Even without taking a victim mentality, however, modern Israelis are still conditioned with an instinct toward fear because of their experience of the Holocaust. They know the warning signs well and are alert for them: a criminalization of Jewish life and the anti-Semitic tendency to view Jews as paragons of the worst social ills. Both of these warning signs, unfortunately, Israelis perceive in some of the rhetoric from their Palestinian neighbors and the wider Muslim world. Because of this, an alert and defensive posture is considered a necessary part of modern Israeli life, but it is one that makes trust and understanding more difficult to achieve.

Halevi closes the letter by recounting his experience of going to Auschwitz in a mixed group of Arab and Jewish Israelis. The trip was organized by a Palestinian Christian priest, Abuna Shoufani, and through that experience, Halevi was given hope for the future of their conflict. If Jews could bare their vulnerability from the woundedness of the Holocaust, and Palestinians could see that vulnerability for what it was instead of a reflexive and hostile defensiveness, then perhaps there could be a reconciliation yet to come.

Letter 10 Summary: “A Booth at the Edge of the Desert”

Letter 10 is the shortest letter in the book, serving as a summary and conclusion to many of the reflections and themes of the volume. Its occasion is the festival of Sukkot, which celebrates the ancient Jewish traditions of their wilderness wanderings in the time of Moses. Since the ancient Israelites lived in tents in the desert during that time, modern Israeli Jews celebrate Sukkot by building booths—temporary shelters that they put up in their yards—and living in them for a week. The scene of the letters thus returns to Halevi’s yard in East Jerusalem as he describes his family’s sukkah and looks over the security wall into the Palestinian neighborhood beyond.

The sukkah is a symbol of transience, of putting one’s trust in God’s protection, and the festival of Sukkot was celebrated in ancient Jewish tradition by saying prayers for the nations. This international theme inspires the decorations in Halevi’s family sukkah, which is marked by Tibetan prayer flags, a Hindu elephant, a Jewish shofar, and a plaque with a verse from the Qur’an. Halevi’s decoration of his sukkah represents the consistent basis of his prayers: “I pray for the shattered peoples around me, but most of all I pray for us, for your people and mine. Ana Adonai hoshiya na: Please, God, save us” (196-97).

He also recalls another tradition of ancient Israel: the story of how the Jews entered their promised land and arrayed themselves on two mountains that faced each other, one side to proclaim the blessings of God’s covenant and the choice of life, and the other side to call out the curses that came from unfaithfulness and choosing death. Halevi writes, “It seems to me, neighbor, that all of humanity is now standing on those two mountains” (198). He emphasizes the importance of pursuing life and blessing, especially as developing modern technology offers an increased potential of widespread violence. Like living in the sukkah rather than in an air raid shelter, he implores that people choose the vulnerability of believing in peace and reaching out with open hands as we strive to make it possible.

Letters 7-10 Analysis

This final section of letters moves from the foci of the earlier sections—Letters 1-3 on the broad themes of the Jewish story and identity, and Letters 4-6 on the more recent history of Israel/Palestine leading to the current state of the conflict—and trains its focus on social and psychological aspects of Israeli life that shape their perspective on the conflict and Palestinians.

The motif of religious and national observances appears again in this section, most poignantly in Halevi’s treatment of the Holocaust in Letter 9. It is striking that Halevi has waited until nearly the end of the book to discuss it, as it dominates the wider perception of the Jewish story in the 20th century. He waits until this point, however, to present the Holocaust as part of the broader arc of the Jewish narrative rather than a seismic event in its own right. It was not, in Halevi’s view, an event that ended Jewish history or redirected its narrative; rather, it was the broader story of Jewish exile encapsulated in a single movement, which is how Halevi interprets it. Rather than seeing the Jews as victims of the Holocaust, as is a frequent perception, Halevi believes that Israelis see themselves as surviving victors of the Holocaust, having outlasted their murderers by merit of their millennia-long habits of endurance. This ties directly back to the theme of The Culture-Shaping Effects of Stories and the indelible mark that the narrative of Jewish self-identity has left upon the Israeli character.

The book’s other main themes are again woven throughout these letters, with the themes of Jewish Peoplehood and Interfaith Dialogue coming to the forefront. The idea of Jewish peoplehood is especially highlighted in Letter 8, where Halevi contends with the diversity of the Israeli Jewish community. He again emphasizes the idea of the Jews as a people, rather than a culture, race, or religion, which provides a binding identity and sense of cohesion in their society. The theme of interfaith dialogue is also prominent, especially in Letters 7 and 10, where Halevi speaks about aspects of the encounter between Judaism and Islam and points to promising signs for a possible future understanding between the two, despite the current difficulties that exist in places like the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa. Ultimately, the solution is to come to the place of a mutual respect, built on their shared devotion to the God of Abraham. If this is done, then the other themes of the book would naturally follow: A mutual understanding between these two peoples of Abrahamic faith would require a recognition of one another’s cultural stories, the narratives that shape who they are. Recognizing those narratives would then allow for an understanding of the validity of the other side’s claims to the land and the necessity of self-sacrifice in order to accommodate the other’s presence.

The motif of the neighbor comes full circle at the end of the book as Halevi considers the shared faith, sense of justice, and cultural narratives of his Muslim counterparts across the security wall. To be a neighbor in the best sense is more than just a willingness to live in proximity with an enemy whose presence one must tolerate; it is the acceptance of the other’s right to live nearby and a celebration of the mutual strength each side gains from the other’s presence. That vision of the neighbor expresses Halevi’s highest hopes for the future of the Israel/Palestine conflict, but it must begin with an open and willing dialogue that gives voice to their own sense of self-narrative, justice, and faith.

Although Letters to My Palestinian Neighbor is not written with a cohesive narrative, Letter 10 nonetheless closes the narrative arc of the book by returning to the scene with which Letter 1 opened: Halevi’s yard in East Jerusalem, from which vantage point he can look over the security wall and see the homes of his Palestinian neighbors in the adjoining community. Despite the many difficulties and the overall sense of heartbreak and frustration that pervades Halevi’s reflection on the current state of the Israel/Palestine conflict, Letter 10 manages to leave the reader with a sense of optimism for the future, of hope grounded in the mutuality of faith and prayer.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 44 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools