logo

57 pages 1 hour read

A Great Reckoning

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2016

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 22-31Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 22 Summary

Gamache shows the original map to Charpentier. Surprisingly, Charpentier wants to go with Gamache to Three Pines so that he can see the window as well. Charpentier and Gamache arrive at the chapel, met by the four cadets and Reine-Marie, Myrna, Clara, and Ruth. Charpentier observes that the visual composition of the window puts the focus on the soldier’s face, distracting from the map but also not hiding it. The group finally disbands to their various homes, with Charpentier staying with Gamache and Reine-Marie. Charpentier asks about the cadets, and Gamache explains that these four were the closest to Leduc, having been singled out as his protégés. Gamache also reveals having given them copies of the map and that one of those copies was found in Leduc’s room.

Charpentier and Gamache discuss several possibilities: if the killer is framing Amelia, he might be coming after her next and planning to pass her killing off as a suicide. It’s also possible that either she or one of the other cadets did kill Leduc. Charpentier talks about how wondrous the maps are and how they have inspired and influenced him to study tactics; as he reflects, “maps gave [humans] control over their surroundings, for the first time ever” (194). Charpentier shares his observations of the map: he thinks it is an early orienteering map and that it was given to the soldier to remind him of home and maybe even guide him back.

Chapter 23 Summary

At Myrna’s home, Jacques does an internet search on Gamache and, for the first time, sees video footage of Gamache under fire during a police raid on a factory. Gamache displays heroism and great tenderness for Jean-Guy, who is seriously wounded during the attack. However, Jacques does not fully understand the context of what he is seeing.

Chapter 24 Summary

Gélinas and Lacoste meet with Mayor Florent, the mayor of St. Alphonse. Florent is known to have had an extremely antagonistic relationship with Leduc and the academy and is, therefore, a potential suspect. Florent flatly denies any involvement in the crime, but he doesn’t hesitate to admit that he hated Leduc, and his anger is apparent. He explains that he was at home with his wife the night of the murder, but it still seems possible that he could have snuck out and potentially gotten access to the academy due to the faulty security system.

Meanwhile, Jean-Guy phones the company that manufactured the revolver used in the murder. He speaks with a woman named Elizabeth Coldbrook. She confirms that Leduc purchased the revolver; it is a rare design and mostly purchased by collectors interested in antique weapons. Elizabeth also explains that the company doesn’t manufacture silencers, as they don’t work on revolvers; she seems confused when Jean-Guy insists that this revolver had one.  Jean-Guy notes that “even down the phone line, across the miles, across the ocean, he could hear her thinking” (208). She has no other information to offer, even when Jean-Guy reveals that the weapon was used in a murder. As requested, she follows up with an email summarizing their conversation, and Jean-Guy notices that the email is signed “Elizabeth Coldbrook-Clairton,” with “Clairton” typed in a different font.

Back in Three Pines, Gamache tells Charpentier that he must not reveal to anyone that the cadets are in Three Pines; everyone in the academy thinks that they are back with their families. Charpentier wonders why Gamache was so transparent with him, and Gamache reveals that he purposefully let Charpentier hear the conversation about the map so that he would become intrigued and involved in the case.

Chapter 25 Summary

Gamache and Charpentier meet with the cadets; Gamache explains that they are returning to the academy but will be back that night, and he expects them to have more information about the map. Jacques openly challenges Gamache, complaining about being kept in Three Pines. Gamache chastises him, telling the cadets, "I’m tired of this childish behavior. You need to stop sniping. You’re not in a schoolyard” (212). Charpentier also explains his theory that the map is an orienteering map. Orienteering was initially developed as a tactical military exercise for soldiers in the Boer War and World War I to prepare them to find their way around a battlefield. It later developed into a sport. Charpentier believes that whoever made the map was both an orienteer and a skilled map maker. The soldier seems too young to have made the map himself, so they theorize his father might have made it and given it to him to remind him of his home and symbolically guide him back.

For the next step in investigating the map, Gamache tells the cadets to look at the property records and find out who owned the bistro before it was sold and converted to a restaurant. Gamache also talks to Myrna since he has noticed that Jacques’s anger and disrespect have only increased. Myrna shares that Jacques watched the footage from the factory raid and was shocked by the horror and violence. He, unfortunately, seems to see the raid, in which several agents died despite Gamache’s efforts, as further evidence against Gamache.

Chapter 26 Summary

Gamache, Charpentier, Jean-Guy, Gélinas, and Lacoste meet to discuss the meeting with the mayor and the investigation. Lacoste concludes that Mayor Florent remains a suspect. They also share their theory that the weapon being left at the scene likely points to an experienced killer. Several different DNA traces and fingerprints have also been found in the room; not all of it has been analyzed, but thus far, fingerprints belonging to Brébeuf and Godbut have already been found in the room. Gamache and Gélinas plan to question Brébeuf why he was in Leduc’s rooms. They also guess that some of the remaining unidentified fingerprints belong to various cadets.

Confusingly, the revolver itself has partial prints from several different people, including both Amelia and Gamache. Gamache suggests that Leduc might have shown off the weapon and let others handle it; this would explain the variety of fingerprints but not why Gamache’s seem to be included among them. Amelia’s fingerprints have been located on the revolver’s case. Jean-Guy shares what he has learned about the gun, and Gamache notices in the research that the McDermot revolver used in the killing first became popular during World War I.

Gamache recollects that the soldier shown with the map in the stained-glass window also had a revolver. For the first time, he openly shares that a copy of a map found in Three Pines (and depicted in a World War I commemorative window) was also found in Leduc’s bedside table. Gélinas is very annoyed and suspicious to only be finding out this detail now. As a desire to question Amelia grows, Gamache also admits that the four cadets are now in Three Pines. Gélinas is outraged, especially when he realizes that the others also know. He increasingly sees Gamache’s actions as evidence that Gamache was somehow involved in the murder and has been taking steps to conceal his actions not to protect the cadets.

Gamache counters that the case is becoming increasingly complex; as he points out, “Don’t you think it’s strange in the extreme that the killer knew enough to drop the weapon, but not enough to wipe it or wear gloves?” (229). Nonetheless, Gélinas persists in his theory: he asks the others if it seems plausible that Gamache would have been willing to kill Leduc if it meant finally freeing the students from Leduc’s pernicious influence. The group awkwardly concedes that this sounds like something Gamache would indeed want to do. Nonetheless, they disagree with Gélinas and fear that he is playing into the killer’s hands by getting distracted and focusing on the wrong details.

Chapter 27 Summary

In Three Pines, Huifen and Amelia have looked up the head of the local orienteering club and gone to show her the map. She quickly confirms that it is an orienteering map and explains a bit more about how orienteering works. Participants use a compass and map to navigate to certain marked spots and figure out the fastest route between them. Meanwhile, Jacques and Nathaniel have gone to the records office to try and determine who owned the bistro in the early 1900s. After digging through boxes of physical records, they cannot find any records for anyone with the same name as the fallen soldiers.

Huifen and Amelia move on to the Commission de Toponymie, the government office responsible for mapping and naming the local region. A man named Bergeron immediately identifies the map as the work of the cartographer Antony Turcotte. Turcotte is an extremely important figure in Quebecois cartography and had a deep love for the Eastern Townships region (where Three Pines is located); he mapped most of the region himself. Bergeron thinks the map is a hybrid between a real map and an orienteering map, personal and whimsical touches. Amelia and Huifen explain their theory that the soldier in the window might have been Turcotte’s son; however, they are puzzled when they see a large map in the office, also created by Turcotte, which does not depict Three Pines. If Turcotte knew Three Pines well enough to create the detailed orienteering map, why would he have left it off all other maps?

Little is known about Turcotte’s biography; there are no records of whether he had children. He died in 1919 in a village called Roof Trusses (the name was an error when Turcotte mistook the sign of a business for the village's name), but that village has died out and vanished. Huifen and Amelia have Jacques and Nathaniel check the records for anything under the name of Antony Turcotte, but they find nothing. The cadets feel increasingly frustrated since it appears that “everything to do with Antony Turcotte [was] disappearing” (245).

Chapter 28 Summary

Gélinas and Gamache meet with Brébeuf to question him. Brébeuf states that he and Leduc were acquaintances before Brébeuf came to the school and that the two of them spent some time together after Brébeuf began his employment. Brébeuf openly admits that he went to Leduc’s rooms several times and that Leduc alluded to having been involved in illegal activities. He does deny that he ever saw or handled the gun, and since partial prints are so inconclusive, there’s no way to know for sure. Brébeuf insists he had nothing to do with Leduc’s death and that he thinks one of the cadets did it, hinting that Amelia seems capable of such an act. Gamache immediately defends Amelia, arguing that “Amelia Choquet is top of her class. And she swears like the criminals she’ll one day arrest” (251).

After leaving Brébeuf, Gélinas and Gamache talk, and Gélinas admits that he wondered if Gamache and Brébeuf could have conspired to kill Leduc. Gélinas no longer thinks this is the case; he believes Brébeuf’s claim that he wouldn’t have killed Leduc because Leduc was the only person willing to interact with him.

Chapter 29 Summary

Lacoste phones the McDermot Revolver Company to speak with Elizabeth; no one there seems to know her as Elizabeth Clairton, only Elizabeth Coldbrook. Lacoste shares a photo of the stained-glass window, and Elizabeth quickly confirms both the revolver in the window image was a McDermot but that it was not the same one that Leduc owned (Leduc’s weapon was purchased new). Lacoste asks Elizabeth whether her surname is Clairton, Coldbrook, or both and receives a vague reply.

Later, Lacoste speaks with Jean-Guy about this odd detail. They also speculate about why Leduc would keep the copy of the map in his bedside table and whether that might mean that he and Amelia were sleeping together; it’s possible Leduc kept the map as “a kind of prize, a talisman. Proof of his conquest” (262). As they reflect on Amelia’s turbulent history, they consider different options. She might have killed Leduc to protect her history from becoming widely known, or Leduc might have stolen Amelia’s copy of the map in hopes of planting it in Gamache’s rooms and insinuating that Amelia and Gamache were having an affair (Leduc would have had a motive to want Gamache discredited). They also wonder whether, if Leduc had threatened a member of Gamache’s family, he might have killed him.

Chapter 30 Summary

Jean-Guy, Lacoste, Gamache, and Gélinas arrive back in Three Pines at the same time. Gélinas has investigated the history and friendship between Brébeuf and Gamache; the two men have known each other since childhood and studied together at the academy. Both quickly achieved success within the Sûreté, with Brébeuf surpassing Gamache and becoming his boss. However, when Gamache began to pursue allegations of corruption, he realized that Brébeuf was deeply implicated. Brébeuf had been professionally disgraced and became estranged from his wife and children. Gélinas has also uncovered something about Gamache’s history: “A few lines in a long-dormant document” (276) that gives Gélinas new information he can use in the investigation.

Chapter 31 Summary

The four officers (Gamache, Lacoste, Jean-Guy, and Gélinas) meet with the cadets and the villagers in the bistro. Amelia is overwhelmed to meet Lacoste. The cadets quickly share that they have discovered that the map is an orienteering map made by Turcotte; however, there’s no record of Turcotte ever owning or renting the bistro. Also, none of the soldiers listed on the memorial window were named Turcotte, which undermines the theory that Turcotte created the map for his son. When the mention of Roof Trusses comes up, Ruth immediately points out that the town’s name was changed to Notre-Dame-de-Doleur (Our Lady of Grief).

Gélinas wants to question all the cadets individually, beginning with Amelia. However, Gamache refuses to let Gélinas question Amelia alone and claims to be acting as a parental surrogate for her. Amelia is annoyed by this, and Gélinas begins to accuse Gamache of acting overly protective because of his own experiences: Gamache’s parents were killed in a car accident with a drunk driver when he was eight years old. Jean-Guy and others are annoyed with this personal information being shared, but Gélinas persists, explaining that he wants Gamache to step back from the investigation, especially because he is a suspect. Gamache reluctantly concedes, and both Jean-Guy and Reine-Marie notice how he seems intensely protective of Amelia. Although Jean-Guy tries to resist, he realizes that “he had an idea. An unwanted one. An unworthy one” (285).

Chapters 22-31 Analysis

In this section of the novel, the intersecting mysteries surrounding Leduc’s murder and the orienteering map become more complex, heightening tension and suspense as the plot progresses. A seemingly insignificant detail is introduced that will later become the most important clue in the plot: when Elizabeth Coldbrook emails Jean-Guy, she adds an additional surname, which only captures his attention because she includes it in a different font. The subtlety of this detail aligns thematically with the clues that emerge from other visual media, such as the map and the stained-glass window. The detail also seems like it could be entirely random; as Jean-Guy notes, “I don’t see how it matters […]. What name she uses, or even the gun and the map and the stained-glass window” (260). This comment will become ironic because, in his frustration, Jean-Guy names all the details that will be significant for achieving a true understanding of the crime.

However, the murder is so skillful and complex that even experienced investigators like Lacoste and Jean-Guy feel they are grasping at straws and can’t identify what is important and what is not. Earlier, Jean-Guy had even wondered if the revolver was “not [just] a red herring, a red whale […]. Something so obviously strange we have no option but to focus on it, and maybe miss something else” (219). This quotation puns on the connection between a figurative “red herring” (a false or misleading clue) and a whale while also foreshadowing the subsequent allusions to Moby Dick. Nonetheless, Lacoste’s keen instincts tell her that “something didn’t fit” (259). Elizabeth Coldbrook’s role in the novel is also significant because she moves the plot along but won’t fully commit to acting with courage. She is evasive rather than transparent and provides Jean-Guy with just enough information to encourage him to keep looking but not enough to outright solve the case.

While Elizabeth Coldbrook’s cryptic hints deepen the mystery, the plot becomes more complex as Professor Charpentier and Agent Gélinas become increasingly important characters. Charpentier is mysterious, shrewd, and intelligent; he can quickly draw conclusions that align with Gamache’s suspicions, such as deciding that “Choquet’s [map] is missing? Then she’s the next victim” (192). Gélinas also becomes heavily involved in the investigation, although he becomes an antagonist within the plot due to his growing suspicion that Gamache might be the killer.

Gélinas’s role as an antagonist is important because, at the start of the novel, Leduc is positioned as an antagonist, but once he is dead, there is no one actively working against Gamache. Gélinas slows down the investigation through his insistence that Gamache could be the killer and speeds up the need for resolution because if another killer is not found, Gélinas will be even more likely to suspect Gamache. Gélinas is positioned as a particularly powerful and insidious antagonist because he is intelligent and persuasive; while others reject his accusation of Gamache, they must concede that “if Armand Gamache was ever to commit murder, it would be to save others” (229). The juxtaposition in this quotation reflects the possibility that someone could commit a terrible act with good motives and foreshadows Brébeuf’s true motive.

The increased focus on the orienteering map and the interest that Charpentier displays in it expands the motif of maps and cartography within the novel. Charpentier waxes poetic, explaining that maps “transport us from one place to another. They illuminate our universe” (193) and that their development meant that humans “could plan, they could strategize” (194). Charpentier’s enthusiasm in these quotations is important because it contrasts with how his character usually appears. He later also connects the value of maps in creating a culture and a sense of unity, explaining that “one way to defend the patrimonie was to map it and name it” (241). The reference to patrimonie reflects a broad concept, encompassing “heritage. Their language, their culture, their inheritance. Their land” (240). Thus, maps are positioned as a motif with both existential and cultural contexts and a way of creating order and meaning. The motif of maps becomes particularly important as the investigation seems to be descending into a chaotic assortment of random details. Maps provide a sense that both geographic terrains and difficult situations can be navigated through careful observation and meticulousness. 

Gamache occupies an increasingly complex role in this section since he is actively participating in a murder investigation and is increasingly positioned as the prime suspect. The two roles reinforce one another because the more vehemently Gamache insists on contributing to the investigation, the more it seems like he may have something to hide and be trying to manipulate the case. Actions such as moving the cadets to Three Pines are carried out with good intentions but can also seem highly suspicious and even arrogant. Gélinas finally bursts out against Gamache, complaining that “this isn’t the Vatican and you’re not the pope. You’re behaving as though you’re all powerful. Infallible” (227). Comparing Gamache to the pope alludes to the motif of Leduc as the Duke, a similarly autocratic and often-times corrupt figure.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 57 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools